On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:37:11PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 14:25]:
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > And who looks after a week into the buildd logs and if perhaps
> > > some arch failed to build because something changed in one of
> > > the build dependencies?
> >
> > Isn't that what we have buildd maintainers for?
>
> I don't know exactly, but I was under the impression the buildd admins do
> not waste their time with anything obviously not caused by their buildd or
> their architecture.
That doesn't fit the above description ("some arch failed because
something changed in one of the build dependencies"). It would if it
would've said "half the arches failed because something changed..."
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
