* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060804 11:17]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > > Hm, ok. I can see your point, but I disagree (but of course, I'm biased). > > > > > > Anyways, if more DDs feel your way, I will remove DebianTimes. (DWN was > > > removed due to flooding planet, not for "it's not a personal blog, btw.) > > > > After some more of the feedback, I decided to remove it from > > PlanetDebian. That same reason should IMHO also apply to removing the > > DebConf Blog (and not adding one for DebConf 7) and permanently removing > > DWN from PlanetDebian. > > As far as I know DWN is permanently removed. If readers want to read > it via a feed aggregator, they are invited to use one of the RSS feeds > at http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/dwn.$(LANG).rdf > > There's a comment in the Planet configuration file to prevent further > addition. I guess a similar comment should be made for Debian Times.
DWN was removed because it floods planet (because every spelling fix changes the published date). A comment about impersonal blogs has already been commited by me to the config file after sending out the previous mail. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]