Nathanael Nerode writes: > If you want to amend the DFSG to state > > "3. Source Code > The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in source > code as well as compiled form. However, this requirement does not apply to > firmware, defined as <insert your pet exemption here>." > > I would strongly oppose such a change, but it would be a legitimate, > reasonable GR (requiring 3:1 supermajority of course).
Recent history -- in particular, GR 2006-001's winning option -- suggests that broad DFSG exemptions, when treated as clarifications or interpretations of the project, are not necessarily so clear-cut about requiring a 3:1 supermajority. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
