On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:39:03 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Instead, after 4-6 weeks beyond the date of the priginal proposal, >> allow for 4*K developers to cut the proposal time short (say, >> impose a deadline of now + 2 weeks). This means not only that the >> interval is large, but a number of developers also feel that the >> resolution is being stalled deliberately. > I agree with Manoj that fixing the holes in the Constitution is a > good thing, and I find Manoj's suggestion above a good solution to > the (potential) problem. Manoj, are you going to write this out as a > GR sometime soonish? I am going to wait until some of the current GR's end, in order to maintain a reasonable GR related workload ... manoj -- Nothing will dispel enthusiasm like a small admission fee. Kim Hubbard Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]