On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:09:06AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...] Person A gets mad becuase he is afraid that person B will will 
> > get pay for something that both had originally agreed to do for free.
> 
> Now there's a key part of the problem: this changes agreements that some 
> developers made with the debian project.  While that doesn't make it 
> wrong in itself, some people may not agree with the new terms.  I 
> believe they should be allowed to state their objections in an effective 
> way and suggest ways to find a wider agreement, as a bare minimum.

... and this change ignores year of consensus whereas using Debian money to
pay Debian developers was not OK. For example the thread including this
post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to debian-private. That consensus
was certainly important for my continued contribution to the project.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to