On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:22:30AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Please do not take these requests as an insult to anyone - I simply > haven't been paying this topic much attention for months (and suspect > many other readers haven't been doing so either), so I'd like to see > some recent examples.
Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI Which i will try to improve and complete, accordying to remarks and questions people may ask me about this. For those awaiting evil gossip, you will be strongly disapointed though, since i have decided to not go and add links of those bashings and other not-nice things frans has said about me, but instead, i have written what i believe is a reasonable explanation of why my commit should be re-activated, including information on all the bugs and patches i commited accordying to the rules sets up by the DPL during the mediation, which as you will see ammount to quite a lot, and the sad fact that there was no-one able to take an active d-i powerpc porter lead role, even after all these months. As a conclusion, i believe that the above page clearly shows why my d-i svn commit access should be restored, and that this sad dispute should be forgotten, as i hope we are all mature enough to be able to set aside past differences, and work together for the bettering of debian (and no, the current climate of flamewars and GRs-for-every-flightly-excuse does not contribute to that). So, again, i ask that this issue is but to a stop, that my svn commit access to the d-i repository is restored, that frans stops his provocations against me, and that we go back to coding hapily ever after. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]