On Wednesday 22 November 2006 20:51, Oleg Verych wrote: > I didn't read further.
Which is a pity as he actually makes some valid suggestions that have been brought up in discussions before.
pgpYLvWm4MPrG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 20:51, Oleg Verych wrote: > I didn't read further.
Which is a pity as he actually makes some valid suggestions that have been brought up in discussions before.
pgpYLvWm4MPrG.pgp
Description: PGP signature