Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Debian Vote 2006-1 -- I don't want to become a part of the group of > people who were responsible for classifying the GFDL as "non-free".
Not even RMS claims the FDL is a free software licence: "I am not sure if the GFDL is a free software license, but I don't think the question matters." http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg01221.html > [...] (Or find a new sponsor for packages of these > Emacs add-on software programs, which might be difficult, given how > despiriting the result of 2006-1 was for many Emacs users and > developers.) Huh? Many Emacs users want uneditable software in debian? Wow! Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]