On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:03:03AM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 21:40 +0200, Robert Millan escribió: > > > > > > I believe our silence says it all, no? If they want to donate us money > > > for no 'carte blanche' back good, > > > > Their donations are welcome, their deals aren't. In fact, we could even > > lose > > our permission to use GPLv3 software if we did that. > > > > > otherwise I don't think it's worth > > > write a PR and help them spread their FUD, IMHO. > > > > On the contrary; the objective would be to dismiss their FUD. > > The basic problem is that since GPLv3 has been yet released, we are > releasing de-facto GPLv3 software, in every piece licensed as "GPL v2 or > any later". I can be using a ig chunk of Debian as GPLv3, and nobody can > dismiss this right now.
There are software in main that can be distributed under non-free licenses too. What's the problem ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]