On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:07:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:16:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Did we ever agree a policy about what's acceptable/reasonable for > >> blog feeds linked from planet.d.o? I'm very tempted to disable Ian > >> Murdock's Solaris propaganda, for example... > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > I agree on disabling his blog since it has nothing related to Debian > > on it, anymore. > > Why are we concentrating on Ian? Why is no one complaining about > Clint's blog, which far from having anything to do with Debian, is not > actually related to anything in this universe, as far as I can tell? Or > any of a number of other people who are blogging about their lives, and > often, Debian is a small portion of their lives (aka people with real > lives)? > > If people want to read posting about technical issues or Debian > itself, I suggest they subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The > Planet exists to let us see into the lives of people important to > Debian, not to be a monologue replacement of -devel.
Full ACK. That's what makes Planet Debian interesting to me. I would prefer if people did NOT restrict their feeds for Planet Debian to only contain Debian related posts. Gaudenz P.S.: I think that some way to faciliate the exclusion of some posts or feeds for particular readers (like Myon http://www.df7cb.de/debian/planet/) would be a great thing and solve the problem. -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
pgprvX55FnTp5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
