Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> I wholeheartedly agree with Otavio.
>
> I do as well.
>
>> As I see it, Debian-edu (Skolelinux) has an intend of _becoming_ a CDD -
>> while their products released so far are _derived_ from Debian.
>>
>> I do not share this view with all current members of Debian-edu.
>
> On the other hand the name "CDD" should not be kind of a medal to wear
> but a goal to reach. If a project has understand that it will profit
> from working on integrating their stuff right into Debian to become a
> CDD all parties have won. Finally we want something to work with and
> not only a name tag and becoming a CDD might be a asymptotic process.
Right. It's a goal for most of them. Debian-BR-CDD is going to start
to upload their package in next weeks and we've done a nice bunch of
clean up to allow it to be more acceptable for Debian. We'll probably
don't meet this goal for lenny (to be a real CDD) release but we hope
to do so for lenny+1.
We're able to not change d-i anymore now. This is one of major steps
required. Next is to make GDM more customizable so we can avoid 'sed
hacks' on it ;-)
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
