On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:08:33AM +0000, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should > > > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*. > > > > Should the override file have a justification field for each (error) > > override? That would help generic DD's going through all override > > files. > > override files allow comments which means giving a justification is already > possible. So it seems this just needs to be documented as best practice?
We definitely should have a lintian check for that !!! *cough* -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgprYKWIyuaGs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
