[EMAIL PROTECTED] dropped] On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think this is a great example of why announcements like this should be > sent to debian-devel-announce in the first place, instead of being relegated > to the debian-infrastructure-announce list that most developers aren't > subscribed to. > - d-d-a is the list that all developers are supposed to be subscribed to, > which means that's the list where announcements of general interest > *should* go. It's not development related tho. And most people really don't need to know it. I suppose etc/motd will eventually be updated to point to it also. > This is information that does need to go > to /all/ developers, not just to the infrastructure-announce list Well, you can't please all of them. Frankly, I think most of the posts to d-d-a have no place on that list in the first place. If it's the list DD are required to subscribe to we should try to also send stuff there that they *read*. I hardly read all of the posts sent there. What's the number of affected DDs here? 10? 20? I think dia was the appropriate for that mail. The pointer in buxy's mail was also fine, tho I wouldn't have placed it quite as prominently. > The use of ~user/.ssh/authorized_keys files has been disabled since > DSA1571 was announced. While our initial plan was to allow them > again eventually some bad experience with DDs' key handling has > led us to reconsider that intent. > > ... that means? What bad key handling was seen that warrants such a policy > change? People submitting known bad keys to ldap and stuffing those in their authorized_keys files also. What else did you think it meant? -- weasel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
