On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 18:33:01 -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The change is needed, since the BTS needs to know if the bugs are closed > in that version or not. > > Could you propose an alternative wording for the following paragraph? > <para> > When a package has been NMUed, the maintainer should acknowledge it in > the next upload. This makes clear that the changes were accepted in the > maintainer's packaging, and that they aren't lost again. For this, you > must first incorporate the changes into your package, as far as you want > to keep them. Make sure to include the NMU's changelog entry (not just > the line describing the changes) in your own changelog. This is > important to allow the BTS version tracking to work. > </para> > <para> If the maintainer wishes to acknowledge an NMU, they should include its changes and changelog entry in the next upload. </para>
There's nothing wrong with not acknowledging an NMU. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]