On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:39:20AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:38:48PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > - We keep the right to refuse *any* candidate for whatever reason. > > > > That is not exaclty encouraging. So think maybe you are doing > > something wrong when calling and accepting candidates. > > <rant> > > Oh, please! > > They got less than 5 applications (IIRC from other mails in this > thread), and refused only 1 of it. Do you really think they got that > few applications for that line in the email? >
Oh right, I am still surprised some people continue reading after the line: - need to be able to deal with all the existing team members :) in the same email. > Reality is that nobody was willing/interesting enough to apply, > because it is easier to rant against slow NEW processing than stepping > up and offer help in such a boring task. Before complaining *you* > need to apply, get refused for whatever unfair reason, and only then > you can (re)start complaining. > I am sure more than 5 people would apply and they would be rejcted without even reading their motivations if it were not by Ganneff. </no ranting sadly> > </rant> > > Seriously, we have had and still have several core teams which were > completely inaccessible to outsiders. In all that, the recruiting > processes of the Release and FTP teams is one of the best things which > happened to us in the history of core teams. > Yeah, it is an improvement over the past but... Do you really think we need proccess for stuff like that? I think people wanting to help in a core team like ftpmaster, after some time helping here and there, with some constructive work, should be allowed in such teams. The sad part here is they^whe had to send a mail asking people to work there and adding such crappy caveats. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]