On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Anyway 2Q is too much in my opinion. Q would be much more reasonable. > > See my reply to Bernd why I think its not.
It seems like most people who responded preferred Q up to now. It might end up as an amendment otherwise. :) > > It would be also be good to add a sentence inviting the seconders to > > explain why they second the proposal. At least it would make the many > > formal mails to second proposals somewhat interesting to read > > (they could even be linked from the vote web page so that voters who have > > not taken part in the discussion can refer to the reasoning of those who > > have brought the option to the vote). > > As a must or as a should? A should would probably work. A should. There's no point forcing anyone to justify his acts, but it's better if he does IMO. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
