On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:18:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:08:26AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Or is some incremental freeze still supposed to happen? > > During the talk/discussion at DebConf, IIRC Luk stated that > incremental freezes had a negative effect because for many developers > it was not clear what/when was going to be frozen. The logical > consequence drawn there (again, IIRC) has been that the release team > would prefer freezing all at once. > > Note, however, that we have always used to have unblocks during > freezes; the policy on how unblocks are handled is completely > orthogonal to how "sharply" you freeze. > > > (Putting -release in Cc to catch their attention.) > > Keeping that to ensure I'm not on crack with my memories :-)
You're not, it's IMHO a faithful wording of our position (with the s/releasing/freezing/ fix ;p) -- Intersec <http://www.intersec.com> Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habou...@intersec.com> Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346 Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131 Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332 37 Rue Pierre Lhomme 92400 Courbevoie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org