Julien BLACHE wrote: > Discussing the validity of security policies is not the point of this > thread, so let's leave it at that, please.
It is exactly the point of this thread if you use it as an argument against a common freeze cycle. > This was only an example, there are others, nitpicking > on this one (or any other, for that matter) is pointless. It's OK to bring it up as an argument, but not to counter it? Counter-argument != nitpicking. I wholeheartedly agree there are other examples, pro and con, but since you brought this up as an argument, there's nothing pointless in countering it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
