On 2009-08-11, Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> wrote: > (NB: denyhosts 2.6-1etch1 and dircproxy 1.0.5-5etch1 were included in > 4.0r3, but didn't have a security.d.o upload, afaics. This is effectively > considering someone who has a DVD of etch r0 and otherwise only updates >=66rom security.d.o)
Sorry, but the contradicts current practise of the security team to not pull a full DSA for minor security issues (at the discretion of the security team) but push them through proposed-updates instead. Apparently the DSA process is too time consuming for those and the security team wants to spend the time on other issues. (Of course the DSA process might need some helper scripts and a reliable buildd infrastructure to consume less.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org