Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> writes: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:53:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> I had actually glanced at working on this earlier, but stopped after a >> small bit of time, because it wasn't particularly useful, and because >> the sheer amount of work that it would require to satisfy the terms of >> the GR. (And frankly, the majority of the conversations in the archive >> either aren't interesting enough to bother publishing, or are on topics >> that such a large number of people will want their messages redacted, >> that it's kind of useless.) > Exactly. As DPL, I asked for volunteers for this back in Jan 2009 but > didn't push it very hard. At the time, only a couple of people got in > touch directly to say they were interested. The GR was an interesting idea, but based on the number of debian-private participants who, for anything that would be of any interest whatsoever after three years, have said they don't want their messages ever disclosed, I think in practice participants have spoken and have basically vetoed any sort of effective disclosure. People have gotten much better about pushing things out of debian-private when they no longer become about things that need to be private, which is probably the best solution anyway. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87632ftwgw....@windlord.stanford.edu