Le Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:16:49AM +1200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > I would, however, keep a short list of shortnames for the versioned > licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses (excluding BSD, plain GFDL, plain > GPL, plain LGPL, plain Artistic): Apache-2.0, GFDL-1.2, GFDL-1.3, GPL-1, > GPL-2, GPL-3, LGPL-2, LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3. > > What do others think?
Even for /usr/share/common-licenses, I think that we should aim at an short name compatibility with SPDX. Here is the current situation: Debian SPDX ------ ---- Apache-2.0 ASL-2.0 GFDL-1.2 — GFDL-1.3 — GPL-1 GPL-1.0 GPL-2 GPL-2.0 GPL-3 GPL-3.0 LGPL-2 LGPL-2.0 LGPL-2.1 LGPL-2.1 LGPL-3 LGPL-3.0 Artistic — Since they have not started to use the short names in real (there is even still no example in http://spdx.org/spec/examples), perhaps they would accept to make the change on their side? Also, if the absence of the problematic GFDL and Artistic licenses is by design, it means that we would need specifiy their short name in the DEP. -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100815143404.ga31...@merveille.plessy.net
