Paul Wise dijo [Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:47:52PM +0200]: > > What about collecting the actual document and attaching them to this > > page (license permitting), or a DOI link? What about merging the > > separate publication list into this page (actually there was a > > discussion on a canonical reference file for Debian related work on > > debian-science some time ago)? > > I doubt many of them have an acceptable license for distributing, > links would be great. > > Merging seems reasonable.
Well, if you are the author, even though the final print-copy files are not freely distributable (as they include layout that's usually property of the publishing journal/editorial), you can always decide to share publicly the final version you sent for them to form. Having that, together with full publication information, should be enough. Also, thankfully, every day there are more Open Access-friendly academic publications. FWIW, my University (not a particularly liberal one, and a very large one) is pushing all of its Institutes and Faculties to set up public repositories with Open Access (yes, not necessarily DFSG-free, but a huge difference from the completely closed model used until recently). > > The publication itself can be considered feedback -- it is just that you > > need to know that it is there in order to be able to read it in order to > > form a personal opinion. > > Yeah, especially if the research is presented at DebConf. That said it > is one thing to publish some research and present it at DebConf but > entirely another to use those conclusions to actively push Debian in > new/better directions. Please keep in mind that if you presented a preliminary work at a previous DebConf, you can still edit the event and attach the published (or updated) material. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810171546.gf11...@gwolf.org