Le Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:36:28AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > I do think we should, if we join, state publicly (in whatever press > release we generate announcing our membership) that Debian is not adopting > the OSI license review process for Debian and that Debian will continue to > conduct its own license review as we do now, and that we continue to > disagree with OSI in some areas on what licenses should be considered > free.
I think that it is an important clarification to make. Thanks to this clarification, I would like to recommend that, in case the OSI has already discussed a license, this work is taken into account when making a review on debian-legal. The OSI has recently opened public mailing lists and a bug tracker, that will help a lot to avoid duplicating work when it is descriptive or comparative. http://projects.opensource.org/redmine/projects/licensing http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/ http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss/ Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120222010910.gd1...@falafel.plessy.net
