On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 04:40:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-03-27 at 03:45pm, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > Yes, I agree on accuracy. But please, note that "neurotype" - even if > > it hasn't scientific recognition as concept - is the way some people > > define themselves. And we must respect it. > I favor what others have suggested: Completely avoid listing specific > kinds of diversities to avoid misinterpretation that we _favor_ being > non-diversive in certain ways. > I don't mind listing some - but I fear the bikeshedding of which that > should then be. You have "neurotype" as a favorite. I can imagine many > having various favorites ;-) I agree with Jonas here I'd also add that an enormous list of topics of discrimination doesn't make for inspiring prose either, making the whole thing seem like a bureaucratic exercise. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120328165348.gd23...@sirena.org.uk
