Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Validity of DFSG #10"): > I interpreted it in the sense that they are looking for volunteers to > *document* past, present, and future decisions made by ftp-masters. You > interpreted it in the sense that they are looking for volunteers to > participate in the decision process itself.
Ah. Sorry abouut that. As you said on IRC: 18:17 <zack> I wasn't exactly in the mood of making, right now, a revolution into how we decide DFSG-freeness 18:17 <Diziet> Oh I see. 18:18 <Diziet> Right. 18:18 <Diziet> Good. 18:18 <Diziet> Sorry to misunderstand. 18:18 <zack> (it could be done if needed :-), but that's another aspect) 18:18 <Diziet> No, it's not needed. If ftpmaster don't want things to change then great. 18:18 <Diziet> I will say that in the email thread. So yes I think tieing this decisionmaking to the hard work of ftpmastering is fine. Having stuck my neck out I ought to volunteer to help with the documentation. So please count me in. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20716.25475.895500.443...@chiark.greenend.org.uk