Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > >> On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: > >>>> Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom > >>>> between > >>>> CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting CC BY 2.0 in Debian ? > >> > >> We don't want 2.5 in main, we want 3.0. So why? > > > > Sorry, I was mislead by the presence of 2.5 in awstats and > > grub2-splashimages... > > I filed bugs[1][2] for these two packages. The icons in awstats are > even already licensed as CC-BY-SA-3.0[3].
There are also moin, netcdf-java, vlc, or wxmaxima, which either have an inaccurate copyright file or contain files licensed under CC-BY-(SA-)2.5 (and pinta with by-nc-nd-2.5). Note that I have not tried to be exhaustive in my search. I have to apologise for netcdf-java as I think I have wrote on Debian Med's mailing list that the CC-BY and CC-BY-SA licenses 2.5 are suitable for Debian. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130125140700.ga15...@falafel.plessy.net
