Le Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:35:38AM +0000, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > But the main point here is that the team should normally be able to > manage its membership directly. That's how these things have often > been done (sometimes with no explicit DPL rubber stamp, even).
I think that we need both. While the DPL is not the best person to bring new members to the team, it is the best person to ensure that the team does not accumulate too many inactive or barely active members. I think that such teams are dysfunctional, because they look overstaffed while at the same time they suffer from the lack of manpower. Also, the presence of old-timers who have just enough time to press the stop button from time to time but no time for the grunt work can be quite intimidating. If membership is fluid, there is no need to keep a title just in case, and I would prefer the DPL to be actively questionning memberships each time the delegation is renewed. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131205015329.gg15...@falafel.plessy.net