On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: > Eitan Adler writes ("Re: Copyright arrangements for a web project"): >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ian Jackson >> <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >> > * Personally I'm an AGPLv3 proponent. The system ought to be suitable >> > for AGPLv3 provided that its submodules are AGPLv3-compatible (and >> > if they aren't, then we can probably write a licence exception). >> > (The main program I'm thinking of here is a Ruby on Rails >> > application.) What are people's feelings about AGPLv3 ? >> >> It is the least-free license currently approved by the OSI. > > Just out of interest, would you describe the GPLv3 as "less free" than > the MIT licence ?
Yes: there are more restrictions using GPLv3 software than when using MIT software. I fear we may be getting into a license flamewar so I shall only discuss further off-list. -- Eitan Adler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAF6rxg=0gxjo0tCuZO6b+61jZH_HMxcoDwwwggohGz9PV-=t...@mail.gmail.com