Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
> "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <o...@debian.org> writes:
>> Le dimanche, 19 janvier 2014, 12.39:01 Ian Jackson a écrit :
>
>>> I agree. I think that would be quite bad. We could explicitly state
>>> in our TC resolution that the TC decision can be vacated by General
>>> Resolution on a simple majority.
>
>> I don't think our constitution allows a resolution of the TC to change
>> how §4.1.4 has to be interpreted for a GR overriding it[0]. It would
>> certainly need to be checked with the secretary (CC'ed, just in case).
>
> Personally, I think we should amend the constitution to remove this
> requirement, but in the meantime, it's obviously possible for the TC to
> change its own decision. So, failing any other approach, the TC can
> simply vote to adopt the GR decision as its own decision, which only
> requires a simple majority in the TC (assuming this isn't a matter that
> involves a maintainer override).
>
> I'll defer to the secretary on whether it makes sense for the TC to do
> this in advance, or whether to be formally correct we would have to do
> so after the GR had passed.
If you do this in advance, we get the chance for a nice infinite
recursion if the outcome of the GR is to defer the decision to the TC.
More popcorn!
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3dk27w8....@vostro.rath.org
