On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:07:17PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Consequently, any GR about init-related issues would now need to > explicity state that it upholds the CTTE's decision for the default > init system. Lacking that, passing of the GR would, as a *side-effect* > nullify the CT decision about the default init. I would be surprised > if this is what the majority ofthe CTTE intended.
I'd be surprised if even a minority intended this. Remember that over turning the default init will mean a lot of work. Once work has begun on embedding systemd, what would a conspirator really expect to happen if they popped up with "aha! a GR has reversed the CTTE decision! You are now all compelled to put the work in to *actually* reverse it!"[1]. I continue to assume good faith. [1] Imagine this in the vein of Monty Python's Inquisitor sketch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140303090112.ga12...@bryant.redmars.org
