Hi, Ralf Jung: > In fact I am surprised that what we seem to end up with is an > alternative implementation of some internal systemd APIs (called > systemd-shim), which *will* break in backwards-incompatible ways - > instead of a reimplementation of the API that devs (of policykit or > various DEs) care about, namely logind.
Probably because re-implementing all of logind is significantly more work than writing that shim. Even if you *do* have to do it twice, due to changing internals. -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
