On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Therefore I don't see a reason why it is not listed on > > <https://www.debian.org/blends>.
> I would consider it apropriate to list NeuroDebian there but finally > the initiative should come from the people behind NeuroDebian. Since "Pure Blends" is a TM, i.e. means smth specific now (which is great), NeuroDebian shouldn't get under the "Pure Blends" section. Actually may be some blends listed there aren't really "Pure Blends" (not yet at least) in the notion that they use pure blends machinery (e.g. FreedomBox) But since url suggests generic "blends", it might make sense indeed to make clearer distinction of Pure Blends from other beasts. This way, whenever glorious day comes that there is Pure Blends selection interface within d-i, there would be no confusion ;) Then NeuroDebian could qualify as some kind of "Meta Blend" (since going across blends) or just some kind of a generic "Blend". -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
