-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Shirish, all
Sorry for the delay in coming back to this. Finally, after reading the whole thread about this topic, and with my anti-harassment team hat on, I can say that we acknowledge that Shirish is not a harasser and we acknowledge his current efforts to participate in creating a more inclusive and welcoming environment in Debian. Thus, I've proposed the Debian Planet Team to reenable the new feed he specifically provided for the planet. Shirish, I hope we can read you back in Planet Debian soon. Best regards Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona El 08/04/17 a las 06:23, shirish शिरीष escribió: > Reply in-line - > > On 08/04/2017, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: >> Le Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 03:00:10PM +0530, shirish शिरीष a >> écrit : >>> >>> Could you or anybody else please share even if >>> unintentionally, I have been demeaning to anybody in my >>> writings. While I have repeatedly apologized, I would like >>> to know where I have demeaned people. Everybody is welcome >>> to point to me either publicly or privately what is/was >>> demeaning in my writing. >> >> Hi Shirish and everybody, >> > > Hi Charles, > >> I think that there is a broad consensus that the core problem >> is the image that you included, not the writings. >> >> On my side, do trust you that you did not intend to hurt >> anybody, and that you did not intend the use of this image to >> be eye-catching to attract readers, nor to convey derogatory >> messages about women. But Debian is a very broad community, >> so if you are told that the image has made Debian less >> welcoming than it should, and that it has put people at risk to >> lose their jobs, you (and > me) have to trust that. >> > > I understand both the concerns which have been bought and shared > before. > >> If I could sugest a good way out of this situation, it would >> be that you acknowledge (briefly) that you understood that >> images are sensitive materials that have much more potential to >> harm others than just plain text, >and that you will be careful >> in the future. In return, I think that it would fair if the >> anti-harassment team would also acknowledge that you are not a >>> harrasser,to cleary any possible misunderstanding if a third >> party stumbles in > the archives of this discussion at >> some point in the future. >> > > I do acknowledge that images have more potential to harm others, > although I believe in exact opposite that words have both the > power to heal and burn in ways images never can. > > Nevertheless, I did say sorry in > https://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/the-fatalistic-att itude/ > > > > > but if there is anything more that is needed to be done by me which > will make amends I'm ready to do that. If it is simply to > ackowledge here on the mailing list, have done that. If it is to > acknowledge on another blog post that my choice of picture was > not great and be more sensitive in choosing pictures am ready to > do that as well. > > For my part, I also tried asking the same question in > https://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/is-there-a-way-to-make-photos- covered-or-content-covered? > > > > > But as can be seen no one has bothered to reply as of yet. I > would probably use webapps.stackexchange.com to see if some sort > of technical solution is also available that could be used as > well. > > I believe the ideal solution would be a mix of both social and > technical solution . > > As an aside, yesterday, I just registered and tried hex.bz which > is a public instance of mastodon and saw there is a neat CW > (Content Warning) code which hides content and if people want to > make a choice to still see the content then they are > responsible. > >> Have a nice week-end, >> > > The same to you as well sir. > >> -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan >> > >
