On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 05:50:03PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15271 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > And I sometimes remove blogs for them just going 5xx. A commit msg > > > is fine. > > I still think an email to the author would be a good thing in that case. > > I have had parts of my site stop functioning and known of it for some > > time. An email from someone telling me that it is broken is something I > > consider to be helpful. > > In principle I agree. Now tell me, for a good chunk of the planet blogs, > which email? Without investing lots of time to find out. > I see your point. My invalid assumption and my ignorance regarding the implementation of Planet did not allow me to see that there was a potential obstacle there.
> > > And who says a commi message is short? Write a novel, if you want. > > > :) > > I think we have enough flamewars ongoing at the moment that I am not > > going to take the bait to start a philosophical/religious discussion on > > the merits of short/concise commit messages :-) > > But but, I was short, I only used 4242 words why I added a comma at that > position! > Just be sure to keep the first line to a maximum of 72 characters followed by a hard line break and a blank line so 'git log --oneline' looks sane. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez