On 2019/01/05 23:24, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Military pilots of aircraft with ejection seats are limited both to a minimum > and maximum height. It's not fair that if that's your dream job that you are > excluded because you are too tall or too short, but it just isn't > economically > or operationally feasible to develop, test, and maintain a wide variety of > ejection seats to accommodate the full range of the human condition. > > All accommodations have practical limits. In my reading of the Diversity > Statement and CoC, I don't see that recognized and I fear how far it will be > taken in the future.
I want to start off by assuring you that I understand what you mean, but I can't think of an example of such a practical limit that would currently apply to the CoC, can you? The closest kind of example I can think of is if someone doesn't have access to any kind of computer, it's kind of impossible to become an uploading DD in such a case, and it's not that we're exclusionary, just a practical limitation. However, I don't think that specific one is even worth mentioning in a CoC, but if you have identified specific limits, can you share them? A CoC can always be amended or at least some annotations made to explain it. -Jonathan -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer - https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.