On September 12, 2019 5:30:24 PM UTC, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>I'm trying to move a thread from -devel.
>
>Ian Jackson responded [1] to part of a consensus discussion on Git
> recommendations. I had said that I think we recommend against the use
> of non-free services like Github but do not forbid their use.
> Ian disagreed with this recommendation.
>
>I responded [2] noting that around 7% of the packages with a vcs-git in
> unstable are hosted on Github.
>
>Ian said [3] that he was confident if we had a GR to forbid use of
>services
> like Github it would pass.
>
>He proposed the following text for such a GR.
>
>I think such a discussion is better on -project.
>
> [1]:
>https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/23927.51367.848949.15...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
>[2]:
>https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/tslwoedy93e.fsf...@suchdamage.org
> [3]:
>https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/23930.17192.131171.455...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
>
>
> Subject: Free Software Needs Free Tools
>
> No Debian contributor should be expected or encouraged, when working
> to improve Debian, to use non-free tools. This includes proprietary
> web services. We will ensure this, insofar as it is within Debian's
> collective control.
>
> For example, Vcs-Git fields in source packages must not refer to
> proprietary git code management systems. Non-Debian services are
> acceptable here so long as they are principally Free Software.
>
> We encourage all our upstreams to use Free/Libre tools.
>
> We recognise that metadata in Debian which describes the behaviour
> of those outside our community, for example fields which refer to
> upstream source management systems, may (in order to be accurate)
> still need to refer to proprietary systems.
It's based on a false premise. No one is forced to use any VCS to maintain
Debian packages. If you don't want to talk to GitHub, send a patch to the BTS.
Scott K
