On 9/29/19 1:17 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: > I'm a bit concerned about your argumentation style in this thread. It > feels to me a lot like you're saying that people are wrong simply > because they are disagreeing with you. In future discussions, I'd > recommend finding a way of having the discussion that acknowledges > disagreement and is more focused on understanding positions than judging > them or persuading others.
I don't think that this is the case. I'm just arguing that we have double standards here. You can't say one the one hand, that Debian money should not use for non-Debian work and then spend it on outreachy and you cannot say that architecture must be widely available for use and just emulators and then allow s390x to be a release architecture. > Regardless, I think you have your answer. > Absent the appearance of significant new support, there is not > sufficient interest in spending Debian funds on m68k gcc development. I don't think we have heard enough voices yet to be able to answer that question. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913