Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > Any opinion on the "votes twice" part? Anyone?
How many decisions have we had that were decided by a slim enough margin that you believe fraud could have changed the outcome? What have we voted on that you think anyone would care sufficiently about to do the tedious and time-consuming work required to get a fake identity with voting privileges? I'm dubious of the threat model. Injecting malicious code into the archive seems to have a far, far higher reward to effort ratio than voting in our rare and generally not very close project votes. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>