On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:28:58AM -0700, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > Hrm. That doesn't seem to make sense. For example, Python 2.1 supports > > the Python 2.0 API completely, and Python 2.2 supports the Python 2.1 > > API completely too, doesn't it? > API in this context means binary API. Only Python 2.1.X supports the > 2.1 API. > The point is probably moot anyhow since I've almost finished creating > packages using the scheme proposed by Donavon and others. I need to > update the policy and doing some more testing yet though.
Which scheme was that? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgpJ19LhlTsFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature