Joel Rosdahl writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It let's a package depend on: > > > > python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2), python-foo > > > > and can expect a working default Python version, which has support for > > python-foo. > > You mean > > python, python-foo > > I presume?
You may want to do this, if you _know_ that your packages work with python2.4 and python3 as well. > > My proposal would be to build 1.5 and 2.0 packages from one source > > and 2.1 and 2.2 packages from another source package, so the first > > source package and binary packages can easily be removed. > > Why is this easier or better than uploading a new version of the > source package that just builds 2.1 and 2.2 packages? If you support 2.1 and 2.2 only, yes, then it's easiser :) Matthias