Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think we do agree that the License of Python 2.1.1, according to the > FSF, is compatible with the GPL ?
Yes! > This section is incorrect, in that Python 1.6.1 has yet another > different license. It should read something like > > The License of Python 1.6b1 and later versions, through 2.0 and 2.1, > but excluding 1.6.1 and derivatives thereof. No, this is not correct. Although the 1.6.1 version was licensed in a way CNRI believed to be GPL compatible, the FSF still disagrees.
