Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 21:29, Jim Penny wrote: > > Thinking about fog's reply: > > > > was there an earlier python-egenix-mxdatetime compiled for 1.5? > > > > I have > > Package: python-egenix-mxdatetime > > Version: 2.0.2-5 > > Depends: python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2), python2.1-egenix-mxdatetime > > > > which is certainly not going to be compatible (or even findable) by > > a zope1.5 extension. > > > > I wonder if we have gotten lucky because people who needed python-psyco > > (now python1.5-psyco) are pinned by some other dependency so that > > their python-egenix-mxdatetime has not been replaced? > > no. it was my fault. my devel machine has a strange combination of > packages satisfying the dpendencies and an old mxdatetime 2.0.2 compiled > by myself in /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages making the > python1.5-psycopg package working. the package now in debian is b0rken. > sic. > > > Postscript: fog, does that mean that you intend to continue to maintain > > python1.5-psycopg for a while? > > at least until python1.5 exits from debian.
Sounds like you guys could use a python1.5 version of mxdatetime, then... I'm willing to maintain such a package, but the best solution is maybe that one of you creates a separate python1.5 mxdatetime package as you like and also maintains it? Regards, Joel -- Joel Rosdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (PGP and GPG keys available)