Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate >> perl too, but really, the argument "hey, people like Python too" >> implies that we should have a scheme interpreter, a perl, a python, >> emacs lisp, and well, everything anyone might want. > > Ubuntu developers would like to be able to use Python. So far there has > been no demand whatsoever for LISP derivatives in this context.
Ok; Joe Wreschnig just said that "I would like to write scripts in X" is certainly not a good enough reason to add X to Essential. It sounds as if you are in disagreement with him; have I understood correctly.? >> Or, we say "we aren't going to support *every* high-level language" >> and stick to one. > > We aren't going to support every high-level language, but we do support > more than one in Ubuntu. The question is, why? Is it just "we want to use Python too"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
