On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:49:16PM +0100, Pavel Šimerda wrote: | On 2006-02-10 18:12, Josselin Mouette wrote: | > Le vendredi 10 février 2006 à 16:46 +0100, Pavel Šimerda a écrit : | > > > For a module that has few or zero reverse dependencies, there should be | > > > one single package, named python-foo, containing the module for the | > > > default python version. Anything else is just cluttering the archive. | > > | > > You think it's better to force users to a specific version... I thought | > > MOST of the packages were in two binary versions (2.3 and 2.4) with one | > > dummy package dependant on the default. It seems you don't like peple | > > who'd like to make their own packages do you? | > | > I don't like people who like to provide several packages just for the | > pleasure of providing several packages. | Not an anwer at all. I mean someone would like to package his program or tool | and make it dependant on kid0.8 templates and python2.4. | | So he sets the dependency: kid (>= 0.8) and python2.4.... currently, kid is | installed in python 2.3 and the dependency just fails. I hate broken | dependencies ;-) as much as any user does
Indeed. You can't mix a non-default version of python with a package that only supports the default version of python. [...] | In these cases I don't even need python-* type of packages... because I know | which versions I support in my programs. Your program "should" use the default version of python. The python-* meta packages exist to make transitions easier. When a library 'foo' supports both the current/previous python and the current/next python, the python-foo package is trivial to change so that all dependents (who are using the default version, not a specific version) will use the new default. | And because i was looking at python package called kid... expected python-kid | but that was just 'kid' If it is a library, not an application, then I would consider that a bug in the packaging. If kid is a library and it works with python 2.4 and if you need to use python 2.4 for your application, then you'll need to do one (or more) of the following: + kindly ask the maintainer to provide a binary package for python 2.4 (in addition to the binary package for 2.3) + create your own unofficial python2.4-kid package + install kid locally outside of the package management system + wait for the default python to be updated | And also confused by the fact that python2.3 and python2.4 families | are not at all complete as I expected. Per the Python Policy, maintainers are allowed to support only the default version of python. Thus I would expect to have more libraries available for python 2.3 (the current default) than for 2.4. One last time, the solution is to update the default version of python :-). (for reference, 2.4 was released as stable by upstream 14 months ago) HTH, -D -- If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature