OK - thank you. I have just submitted a bug report to the BTS.
Manuel Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le ven 21 juillet 2006 13:31, Manuel Metz a écrit : >> Sorry to bother you again. I have the feeling that the maintainer of >> SOAPpy is not fixing bugs very quickly :-( I figured out a problem >> with fpconst.py again (not yet reported the bug to debian bug >> report). >> >> The version included in SOAPpy (0.6.0) does not work correctly on 64 >> Bit systems. G. R. Warnes has released an updated version: >> http://mac.warnes.net/~warnes/files/fpconst-0.7.2.tar.gz >> , also attached to this E-Mail. >> >> Could you please update the package. >> >> And again, sorry for bothering you. >> >> Manuel > > well, I'd like to avoid doing that, I don't use python-soappy at all, > even does not know what it does. My two previous uploads were due to : > (1) transitionning the package to a new packaging standard, > (2) fixing a bug due to my previous upload (that you reported to me, > and you were right to do so). > > But I'm not well placed to deal with a package I don't know well. I > forward your mail to the debian-python list, maybe someone will be > willing to check on that package, and ensure it's of release quality. > > Also note that if the package is unusable, you should open a bug on the > BTS, with a high severity (if relevant). bugs of high severity *will* > be checked by developpers, presumably by some that know about that > package better than me. > > Note that here, I'm convinced a new upstream has to be packaged asap, > but as said, not knowing the package, I don't know how stable the more > recent upstream releases are, and can't take such a decision. > > Cheers, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]