On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:54:14PM +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > The email in [1] discusses the long double transition from 64 to 128 > bit. It claims that the python2.[45]-dev packages need to be updated > for this too, however I can not find the related bug reports for this. > I have also looked in de changelog files but can't seem to find a > mention of it. So have the python packages been updated for this?
> The reason I'd like to know is because #430281 is a serious bug filed > against a package for this long double (ldbl) transition. But this > package does itself depend on python-dev so I need to wait for > python2.[45]-dev to have done this transition first. A number of the packages identified as being affected by the ldbl transition were false-positives, because 'long double' appeared in their headers but was not related to declarations of symbols exported by the library itself. python2.4-dev was such a false positive. If a bug was ever opened for it, it's been closed and archived long ago. You should proceed with the ldbl transition for your own package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]