Michael Schutte wrote: > And then there is rst2pdf (Chris Lamb) which does the all-in-one thing > in a single eponymous .deb. [..] > Since I care about consistency, I’d like to get this sorted out. My > personal preference would be “python-docutils-X”: it’s short, > reasonably precise and explanatory.
Hm, I do like your proposed naming scheme, but the current package name
seems to be more explanatory than "python-docutils-pdf", and the foo2bar
naming scheme has some history in the PostScript world. I guess this all
depends on your level of abstraction.
I wonder whether having two packages would be overkill? eg.
Package: python-docutils-pdf
Depends: python-reportlab, [..]
Contains the library.
Package: rst2pdf
Depends: python-docutils-pdf (= ${binary:Version}, [..]
Contains /usr/bin/rst2pdf, manpage, etc.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected]
`-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
