Hi Ben, Thanks for your answer. It is rather the opposite. I am the upstream author of Phatch, and less of a packager. I just now enough to maintain the existing package as it is, but not to do changes to the package. So if I include the copyright file upstream, I need to know how to change the packaging. Should that be done in debian/rules? Best regards, Stani
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au<ben%2bdeb...@benfinney.id.au> > wrote: > Stani <spe.stani...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I'd like to include the copyright file in the source tarball of phatch. > > Right now it was only present in the debian svn papt repository. As I > feel > > that other linux distributions need this file as well, would it be > possible > > to that the installation scripts copies it from the source tarball into > the > > debian folder in such way that it can be removed from svn debian? > > Are you in communication with the upstream developers? You could > maintain a patch adding the file you want in the source package, present > that patch to upstream arguing your case for why it would be good to > include it, and remove the patch when it's incorporated upstream > > -- > \ “In case you haven't noticed, [the USA] are now almost as | > `\ feared and hated all over the world as the Nazis were.” —Kurt | > _o__) Vonnegut, 2004 | > Ben Finney > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > > -- Phatch Photo Batch Processor - http://photobatch.stani.be SPE Python IDE - http://pythonide.stani.be
