(filtering out some of the interested mailing lists) * 2009-06-23 20:19, Erik Rose wrote: > I'm sad to see Plone support go, as I have a lot of reservations about > how Plone is distributed these days.
FWIW, I'm sad too and I share your same reservations about how Plone is distributed. > Actually not; it works in 2.5 and 2.6. 2.4 is unsupported by 2.12, > though it "should work". > http://docs.zope.org/zope2/releases/2.12/WHATSNEW.html#support-for-newer-python-versions My fault, I wanted to write 2.11 (which is the current stable release, as today). Sorry for the wrong number. > Were you aware that we've renumbered the releases and inserted a less > ambitious Plone 4, which should be in beta by the end of the year? It > will run on (and require) Zope 2.12. Plone is finally joining the modern > Python world. :-) I don't exclude to support Zope 2.x again in Debian and Ubuntu, but I really think that in this moment dropping the packages is the best solution: we will finally be able to drop python2.4. For Plone, after 5 years of maintenance in Debian, I'm sure that *not* having an official package (eg. included in Debian stable) is the best option for our users. -- Fabio Tranchitella <kob...@debian.org> .''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user. : :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _____________________________________________________________________ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature