Hey, On 05/07/2009 Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > * 2009-07-02 14:04, Jonas Meurer wrote: > > I do think that the debian zope managment tools (dzhandle, > > zope-debhelper) do a great job, and I really would be sad to see them > > go. > > > > I already did some housekeeping maintenance work for zope2.{10,11} and > > zope-common in the past, and I intend to continue that work in the > > future. > > zope-common is really usable on for Zope2: nobody uses "instances" for the > zope3 stack anymore. Maybe we should make a new upload to zope-common do > remove support for the zope3 stack (which will be removed from unstable > very soon, as a monolithic package).
yes, if dzhandle is not useful for zope3 anymore, then zope3 support should be removed from it. i didn't use zope3 yet, so i don't know anything about that. > > With that roadmap we at least would have one zope2 version in > > debian/unstable all the time. > > It is possible, are you going to commit yourself to maintain it? That would > be great: I'm not a zope2 consumer anymore, so it is quite pointless for me > to maintain it. in fact i already prepared and uploaded zope2.11 and also did the last uploads of zope2.10 and zope-common. and i intend to keep on doing the work. so yes, i somehow do feel responsible for zope2 in debian :-) still i would be really glad to have you as backup maintainer, especially as you have much more zope/python skills than I do. greetings, jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org